Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I've seen everyone talking about AI Agents helping with on-chain operations. I'm quite interested but also instinctively anxious: it can click buttons and calculate paths without issue, but when it comes to the step of "handing over the money," I still need to cover myself. For example, during cross-chain transfers, whether the contract address or route has been temporarily changed, or if there are any suspicious authorization pop-ups—I’d rather take half an hour to verify every word myself; also, regarding authorization and signing content, no matter how smart the Agent is, it could be misled by the frontend or prompted with biased instructions, and ultimately, the wallet bears the blame. Then there's the issue of encountering exceptions, rollbacks, or getting stuck—deciding whether to retry, switch channels, or stop-loss exit—I feel like these decisions can currently only be made by a human. The rhythm of inflation in blockchain games combined with studio manipulations also reminds me: the more seamless automation becomes, the easier it is to unknowingly spiral into trouble... Anyway, my current principle is: let it handle information and simulations, but for the final signing and cross-chain steps, I do it myself.