Let me tell you, every time I see the words "cross-chain bridge" now, I start to sweat... After being liquidated last time, I have a bit of PTSD, I'd rather go slow than rush. Basically, a bridge is just packaging a bunch of trust: who exactly are the multi-signers, will they pretend to be dead if something really happens; if the oracle feed price/status gets stuck, you think you're on the chain, but you're actually waiting for someone else's approval.



Recently, during the extreme fee period, the group was arguing whether to reverse the transaction or keep squeezing the bubble, but I’m not interested in joining the hype. Especially when crossing chains, I always "wait for confirmation," not being picky, just giving myself a buffer: only move to the next step after seeing the bridge truly credited the funds and the status is stable. Going slow is annoying, but it's more comfortable than "instant credit and instant zeroing out." For now, being cautious is pretty good.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin