Today I looked at another proposal, written like "optimizing ecological incentives," and only realized at the end that the core is two things: who gets the votes, who gets the money. Frankly, incentives are not rewards; they are the ropes pulling voting power toward oneself—who to subsidize, how to set the thresholds, whether delegation brings extra rewards—all quietly changing the power structure.

Recently, the group keeps mentioning staking unlocks and unlock calendars. People are both worried about selling pressure and want to use "short-term incentives" to hold down selling pressure... I find it a bit funny: afraid others will sell, so first concentrate voting rights in the hands of those who won't sell? My neck's a bit stiff, staring back and forth at those parameter pages, eyes sore. Anyway, I’ll write down my reasons for opposition first, to see if anyone still pretends not to see.