Recently, looking at DAO voting proposals feels a bit like watching magic: on the surface, it's "community decision," but underneath, it's actually pre-arranged who gets candy first and who sits in the front row. Others think voting is about democratic expression, but in reality, it's more like choosing a package of incentive distribution + permission switches; clicking agree is like signing over the power structure. What's more annoying is that current on-chain data tools and tagging systems are still criticized for being laggy or misleading, resulting in a bunch of people arguing over screenshots that look "objective"... Anyway, when I look at proposals now, I first check: who gets rewards, who can change parameters, who can perform emergency pauses. As for those pretty narratives, well, I keep them as background music.