It feels like AI Agents can really help you run on-chain, but ultimately, it's still humans who bear the responsibility, at least for now. The reason isn't complicated: everyone wants to be lazy when signing, but if the authorization scope is too broad or if a phishing contract tricks it, the Agent won't feel sorry for your wallet; and then there's cross-chain, where more routes are like toll booths—bridges, verification, message replay pitfalls—if something goes wrong, you can't exactly argue with a robot...



There's also the recent heated debate about privacy coins/mixing and the boundaries of compliance—it's quite a real issue: if an Agent helps you "conveniently" take a sensitive path, who's responsible? Honestly, it's just executing commands; if anyone should take the blame, it's you. My current approach is: let it try small amounts, and before signing large transactions, I review the permissions and target addresses myself. It’s a bit tiring, but I sleep a bit easier.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin