The word "modularization" sounds quite distant, but for end users, honestly: the chain no longer has to bear everything itself, execution, data, and consensus are separated, and in the end, you just click confirm, which can be cheaper, faster, and with a lower failure rate. Don't get stuck on "waiting for packaging" all the time.

For someone like me who focuses on NFT floor prices, the feeling is that liquidity is more fragmented but more portable: yesterday I saw an order, even though the floor didn't move, the same type of transaction on the bridge side was first lifted a bit, and on-chain you could see 0x7e…3a's route was taken first and then flowed back... kind of like water flowing downhill.

Recently, the group has been discussing stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and casually mentioning "de-pegging" rumors. When emotions run high, everyone starts to tremble.
Modularization doesn't solve trust issues, but at least it makes risk isolation clearer: are you worried about who holds the money, or who handles the transaction at that layer?
Anyway, I now prefer to split my positions into separate parts, so I don't bet on one component causing the whole system to collapse.
That's all for now.