Recently, I saw a bunch of delegation voting screenshots flying around in the group, superficially about "participating in governance," but honestly, it’s more like handing your votes to a few familiar addresses to speak on your behalf. At first, I felt pretty reassured: I’m too lazy to watch proposals every day anyway; but the more I looked, the stranger it got. In the end, it’s usually the few who can get the most delegated votes who set the tone, and who exactly is governance tokens really governing… It’s a bit like voting power “liquidity” only flowing to the top players. On second thought, new L1/L2s issuing incentives to attract TVL while old users complain about mining and selling tokens is really the same vibe: short-term incentives amplify the voice, but the consensus that remains isn’t necessarily genuine. Maybe I still trust a slower, more involved approach—even if I vote fewer times, I’d rather not outsource my thinking with a single click.