Lately, doing tasks on the platform feels a bit like clocking in at work: every day before meetings, I check the "score," and a bunch of rules are written more detailed than KPIs, making me feel like a witch warding off a counter-money laundering questionnaire.

Honestly, it's not that earning rewards has become harder; it's that everyone is distrustful of each other, and in the end, only the processes get heavier and heavier.

Am I really participating in governance, or am I just being evaluated on performance?
Probably just working for someone else's risk control model.

What's even funnier is that proposals for protocol revenue, buybacks, and switches are causing a ruckus. I looked at a table and found that the decision-making power often isn't in on-chain voting but in the "are you a high-quality user" scoring system.
By the way, I thought of the recent NFT royalty war of words—creators want stable income, the market wants better liquidity... and in the end, it all comes down to "who can be systemically recognized as deserving money."
Anyway, I’ll keep a full record of my operations to avoid being mistakenly hurt someday; even if I explain for a long time, no one will listen.