Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I've seen people arguing about whether secondary markets should pay royalties or not. Honestly, everyone just wants "cheaper liquidity," but creators can't rely solely on love for their work. The meme community is even more ridiculous—today you're the genius meme king, and tomorrow, once the hype dies down, it feels like you were never here. Sometimes, that royalty money is the only thing that keeps projects alive.
But I also admit that forcing royalties can really scare off a lot of short-term traders. Once they start trading more, they begin to wonder, "Who am I actually working for?" and the market on-chain becomes even colder. Anyway, I now pay more attention to how projects retain the "people willing to pay": like benefits, content updates, offline meme gatherings, and so on—don't rely solely on those few secondary sales.
By the way, before and after a major upgrade of a mainstream public chain, everyone is guessing whether they'll migrate. I see many projects say they won't move, but their contracts are already deployed on multiple chains... The same goes for royalties—when rules are unstable, the first to run are always the liquidity. Sigh, memes can be faith, but don’t make them your livelihood.