Recently, everyone has been talking about on-chain privacy/compliance, but I think ordinary users should lower their expectations first: on-chain is not "anonymous," it's more like "public but hard to read." What your wallet has clicked, who you've authorized, and which addresses you've interacted with—frankly, it's all there, just no one usually translates it for you.



So should I pursue complete privacy?
Not really, more realistically, avoid crossing gray lines and don't expect to be completely untraceable.

The narratives around AI agents and automated trading are getting bigger and bigger, but I'm more concerned about how they interact with wallets: can authorization prompts be understandable, are permissions given too broadly by default, and is revoking permissions hidden too deep? As compliance tightens, the ones who end up unlucky are often those who think "it's just a click." Anyway, my current habit is: avoid unlimited authorization when possible, split funds into different wallets, and take a closer look before signing—so I don't have to explain myself for hours afterward.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin