I saw someone else calling a series of "coincidental transfers" a conspiracy theory and talking about it wildly... I just can't stand it. On the blockchain, there's not that much mystery; honestly, many of these are clear once you look at the same path broken down: CEX withdrawals to intermediaries, then into aggregators/bridges, coming out to several new addresses, and finally doing LP or debt repayment. By straightening the timeline and viewing it in three stages—"fund source → middleware → destination"—many so-called "related addresses" are actually just the same group of people using the same tools.

Recently, the L2 debate over TPS and transaction fees was even more hilarious. The more they argue, the more saliva they spit, and the more information they reveal, the more anxious I get: am I really analyzing the technology or just looking at promotional posters for subsidies... My current filtering method is pretty crude: I don't look at hot posts' conclusions first, only check the transaction hash plus the two jumps before and after. If it explains everything, I stop; if not, I keep digging, so I won't be carried away by emotions.