Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Lately, I've been watching the disputes over secondary market royalties in the creator economy again, and it seems everyone is arguing about whether it should be mandatory or not. But I'm more concerned about whether users are willing to pay that little extra for the work, or if they're just being forced by contracts. Honestly, when mandatory measures encounter cross-chain, aggregators, Layer 2 solutions, and various workarounds, it ultimately becomes a game of who can evade fees best, which is quite awkward.
These days, the "profit stacking" approach of staking/sharing security has also been criticized as a copycat tactic. I suddenly connect the dots: whether it's royalties or profits, relying on structure to lock in people's behavior may seem clever in the short term, but in the long run, it easily turns into mutual exploitation and circumvention. Anyway, now when I see project announcements, I first ask: Can it be used? Can it allow creators to keep earning without moral coercion?
What I’ve learned isn’t techniques, but that you shouldn’t treat economic incentives as magic, especially not expect them to solve human nature.