Lately, I've been really into DAO voting, with the surface saying "parameter optimization / efficiency improvement," but once I turn to the incentives page, the truth is revealed: who gets subsidies, who can propose, who can veto, basically laying out the power structure clearly. What's even more amusing is that some proposals casually adjust the "delegation threshold," claiming to prevent witch hunts, but in reality, they're consolidating voting power within familiar circles.

The calendar for staking unlocks and token unlocks has been repeatedly brought up these days, and everyone is anxious about selling pressure. I tend to first look at whether the proposal has scheduled "buybacks / treasury expenses / reward distributions." Often, price sentiment is superficial; what's underneath is how the budget flows and how votes are obtained. Anyway, before I vote, I check the list of beneficiaries; otherwise, it's easy to be fooled by the words "community interests."