Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Actually, everyone understands that the "cutting in line" on the chain isn't some kind of mysticism; it's just someone spending money or using technology to snatch the position in front of you. Who does it affect? Honestly, it mainly impacts the most common types of slip-sliding market orders and orders placed too close: slippage gets eaten, the transaction price looks ugly, and you might even think you clicked the wrong button.
These past couple of days, I've been watching the transaction sequences of a few swaps, seeing the same address repeatedly stuck in the middle, and it feels more stable than the market… which is a bit annoying. My current approach is pretty simple: I prefer to go slower, use limit orders + tighten slippage, and before on-chain confirmation, I don’t chase after changing orders—at least to avoid giving others a "chance" to manipulate.
Recently, AI Agents and automated trading have been quite popular. Some hype it up as if it can make you money, but really, it’s more like maximizing your interaction frequency. When the frequency is high and safety details slip, MEV and authorization become costs. Anyway, I treat it as a tool first, not a lifeline—if I mess up, I’ll just change it.