Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, everyone has been talking about testing network points again, and the hottest topic is still "Will the mainnet issue tokens or not"... To put it simply, the more these expectations are built up, the more I want to first sort out the security of my accounts. Otherwise, if I accidentally sign something wrong one day, it would be more painful than missing out on an airdrop.
My assets are not large, mainly for daily interactions, so I think a hardware wallet is enough: isolate the main holdings and don't mix them with browser plugins. When the scale reaches a certain level (especially if you have long-term positions and need frequent authorizations), multi-signature is more like a "company account," more troublesome but more reassuring; the drawbacks are also obvious: you need to plan ahead for finding people, collaboration, and emergency situations. I'm also looking into social recovery; it seems suitable for people who are "afraid of losing seed phrases but don't want to memorize security procedures every day," but the dependency relationships need to be carefully considered.
I prefer to first draw the rhythm and risk boundaries, rather than chasing points right away. Anyway, the key is to keep control of the keys and not let emotions make security decisions for me.