The past couple of days, everyone in the group has been talking about whether anyone will move their assets before and after the upgrade of that mainstream public chain. The atmosphere is a bit like waiting for coffee extraction: the more you wait, the more you want to add drama... But honestly, beginners want to see "credibility." Don't just stare at the K-line; checking three things is enough.

Look at GitHub to see if updates are continuous, whether there are a bunch of "spell check" fixes slipping through, and whether someone reviews the key changes; don’t just look at the words "audited" in the audit report—glance at the scope, whether there are known issues marked as "accept risk / pending fix," and whether the team has subsequent commits matching up; upgrade multi-signature setups are even more straightforward: how many keys, who is signing, what is the threshold, and whether the signers are familiar faces or a sudden new batch. Anyway, my own habit is: big code changes + multi-signature opacity = take a few sips first, wait and see.