Lately, I've been a bit speechless about governance voting: a bunch of people delegate their votes, then just wait for confirmation, wait for callbacks, or wait until one day they suddenly remember, "Oh, I’m still involved in governance." Basically, it ends up being a few big accounts high-fiving each other; no matter how well-written the proposals are, it seems more like governance of "liquidity" and "narrative," not governance of users.

I'm more of a tool enthusiast; I prefer automation whenever possible. But delegation feels a bit awkward: it saves effort, but it also genuinely leads to oligarchization. Recently, some regions have fluctuated between raising taxes and tightening regulations, causing deposit and withdrawal expectations to shift. People are lazier about voting and just hand their votes to "reliable-looking people"... Anyway, I now vote small amounts myself, and for large amounts, I wait until I’ve thought it through before acting—so I don’t just hand over power when the mechanical arm is turned off.