I'm now looking at the project "Trustworthy or Not," but I don't pay much attention to the loud claims... First, check GitHub: Are there really people working recently? Are commits just all README updates? Are there bug reports in issues, and are developers responding? I don't expect perfection, but at least don't pretend to be dead. Don't just look at the cover logo of the audit report; I will directly search for how "major/high risk" issues are handled: whether they are "fixed" or "planned," and whether the fixes are actually implemented in the code (many people only change documentation and consider it fixed, lol). Upgrading multi-signature wallets is even more critical: how many keys, who owns them, whether there's a timelock/delay, and whether you can replace the contract with one click... Basically, it's about who you entrust your keys to. Recently, modularization and the DA layer narrative are hot again, developers are excited, but users are confused. I'm even more worried about upgrade permissions that allow "join first, fix later"—I'd rather miss out than become experimental test subjects.