Do you feel like AI Agents are being hyped up now like fully automated workers, but when it actually comes to on-chain actions, someone still needs to cover it… Over the past couple of days, I’ve been watching a few scripts for “automatically doing tasks / automatically farming airdrops,” and the easiest thing to go wrong isn’t the technology—it’s the details: what exactly is being authorized in that signature popup, whether the limits are set too high, whether the contract has been changed under a different label. No matter how smart the Agent is, it’s still hard for it to “be the one who fears death” for you.



Especially now, task platforms are getting harsher about anti-sybil/anti-“witch” measures, and the points system is set up like clocking in at work. The whole one-click multi-account setup that Agents use is, in plain terms, more likely to collide with risk controls. It feels like in the future, AI will be responsible for running the workflow, scanning information, and comparing routes/pathways, while humans handle the final single decisive moment: whether to sign, how much to sign, and how to cut losses if something goes wrong. Anyway, my current habit is: let it draft proposals, and I’ll be the tentacle that does the mine-clearing—tiring, but safer.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin