These days, there's been more debate about whether secondary market royalties should be mandatory or not. Honestly, I'm quite conflicted: if we don't charge them, creators feel like they're being cut off from income; if we do, liquidity drops, no one wants to place orders, and ultimately, creators are the first to suffer. It feels more like a fight over "who will pay the bill" rather than a discussion on how to make the work sell for longer.



By the way, about a certain mainstream public chain planning an upgrade—everyone in the group is speculating whether the project will migrate. I actually think it doesn't matter whether they migrate or not; if royalties depend on the platform's mood, switching chains is just moving the anxiety somewhere else. A friend also said, "You guys in NFT are always arguing about transaction fees." I can only laugh. Anyway, I’m now avoiding high-expectation projects, accepting no royalties as if they don’t exist, considering automatic distribution as a bonus, and just focusing on holding the portfolio steady for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin