Lately, I've been really into browsing DAO proposals, and it's all about "community governance." But upon closer inspection, many of them are really about how to split incentives, who can propose, who has veto power... The power structure is hidden in the clauses. Before voting, I usually look at two things: where the money comes from and who will be harder to replace in the future. That wave of AI agents also seems similar—people hype up "automatic trading + on-chain interaction" as very advanced, but they gloss over security details. When it comes to signing or authorizing, they start acting clueless. Anyway, I'm the slow-cooker type; I prefer to wait longer, watch a few more rounds of discussion, save some gas, and avoid the headache of voting incorrectly—it's worse than missing out on a little profit.