Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I've been lurking in the group for a long time, and today I saw yet another argument about secondary market royalties, and I can't help but say: when it comes to royalties, it's not really about "whether it should be" but "whether it can be enforced." If you want exchanges and aggregators to all obediently deduct them, then it has to be written into the protocol rules, or at least have a default path that everyone agrees on. Otherwise, it ultimately becomes whoever has the most traffic gets to decide, and creators can only rely on shouting to defend their rights, which is exhausting.
What I worry about more is that once cross-chain/bridges are involved, royalties, licensing, and resale conditions become like puzzle pieces with missing corners—Chain A recognizes them, Chain B doesn't. In the end, it all depends on centralized back-end reconciliation, and when bad weather hits, everything mismatches. Recently, AI agents automatically placing orders and interacting have also become quite popular, but I see many are hyping up the "fully automated creator economy," while no one is really digging into the security models and permission boundaries... Anyway, I'm just observing for now. I'd rather buy less than risk future disputes turning into fuel for conflicts.