Lately, people keep talking about "modular blockchains," but honestly, as a regular end-user, it doesn't feel that sci-fi: clicking on a wallet still requires confirmation, and transaction fees still sting. The real difference might be that in the future, the same application can run on different "foundations," and when there's a bottleneck, you can switch to a smoother route, like transferring subway lines... but the prerequisite is that products hide all the messy, laborious work well; otherwise, users will just think everything is more chaotic.

By the way, the recent NFT royalty disputes are quite similar: everyone wants better liquidity and also wants creators to earn a living, but in the end, the pressure is pushed onto "trading experience." For modularity to really be useful, these struggles shouldn't always rely on users to pick sides. Anyway, I just see it as adding a few cloud layer indicators in weather forecasts—looks lively, but whether it rains or not still depends on waiting.