Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Lately, I've been a bit obsessed with DAO proposals (not the price kind), many are written with a lot of "for the community's good," but only at the end do you realize the incentives are tucked away in a small corner: who gets the voting rewards, who can delegate votes, who has a lower proposal threshold... Basically, it's just changing the power structure, but wrapped in a gentle package. What's more outrageous is that many people in the comment section only read the summary and rush in, just like the recent hardware wallet shortages and phishing links everywhere—security awareness and reading comprehension are both gone. A few days ago, I followed a "Governance Science Popularization" account, and he explained complex things like fairy tales, but later I found he never mentioned the key clauses. Forget it, I unfollowed. Now, before I vote, I first check where the incentives flow; otherwise, it just becomes an emotional vote.