Lately, I've been looking at several DAO proposals and they just keep getting more outrageous: on the surface, they say "encourage community participation," but in reality, they're just pushing voting power into the hands of a few addresses, while also opening a continuous money-making channel for themselves. Honestly, incentives are not candy—they're the steering wheel. Whoever holds the steering wheel gets to decide whether they still need you in the future. What's more annoying is that many people only focus on whether the proposal passes or not, without paying attention to execution permissions, who can instantly move the treasury, or who ultimately has the authority to upgrade proxies. Don't put too much faith in on-chain data tools and their tags either—they're often criticized for lagging or misleading you. When you refresh or retry for a long time and see "certain address is the team address," the proposal has already queued and moved into execution. Anyway, before I vote, I first check the permission boundaries; if I don't understand, I assume there are pitfalls.