Lately, I've been reviewing protocol updates, and I’ve been paying less attention to candlestick charts. Instead, I check GitHub and audit reports to at least know “who’s making changes and what they changed.” For beginners, I think there are only three things to consider regarding credibility: Is the code being actively maintained (not just one or two commits and then abandoned), whether the audit clearly states the scope and what’s not covered (many risks are written in areas “we didn’t review”), and whether upgrade permissions are multi-signed and members are decentralized (not just one person’s key being able to change everything). It’s normal for on-chain data tools and their tags to be criticized as lagging or misleading recently. Anyway, I don’t rely on just one dashboard. I keep multiple sources like GitHub, audit reports, and multi-signature info cross-checked, so I feel more assured. Take it slow, don’t ask me to go all-in.