Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, the debate over secondary market royalties has flared up again. My initial reaction was actually quite indifferent: royalties are essentially "transaction taxes." You say creators should get paid, others say liquidity will flow away, and both are right... but don’t turn morality into an economic law. Everyone claims to protect creators, but their fingers still point to the lowest fee rate.
Later, I realized this issue is somewhat similar to the collapse of chain games: inflation rises, studios enter the market, token prices spiral, and in the end, no one makes any profit. If royalties can only rely on "self-discipline," it’s equivalent to defaulting to the least disciplined people setting the market standard. Anyway, I now pay more attention to whether protocol layers can clearly distinguish where the money comes from: who triggers it, who bears the cost. When the table is laid out, the arguments become much quieter.