Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I've seen everyone conclude that "money is coming in" just by looking at charts of stablecoin supply, ETF inflows, and so on. I always feel that's a bit lazy. An increase in supply might just be OTC transfers, market-making rebalancing, or even exchange reserves—it's not necessarily new buying power; the same goes for ETFs. Inflows don't mean the spot market is immediately swept clean. The hedging and pacing involved are quite complex. Honestly, the correlation looks comfortable, but don't rush to assume causality.
These days, AI agents and automated trading are being hyped up again, but I'm more concerned about: as on-chain interactions increase, who is seriously scrutinizing the security of permissions, signatures, and contract calls? In extreme scenarios, issues never stem from "misreading the trend," but from a chain of failures—stuck points, rollbacks, liquidations. Anyway, I now prefer to have fewer assumptions and more contingency plans—survive first, then consider the rest.