Recently, someone asked again, "Is on-chain privacy equal to avoiding regulation?" Frankly, I think ordinary users should lower their expectations: privacy is more about "less exposure," not "complete disappearance." Using privacy tools at most makes it harder for outsiders to easily trace your entire family relationship graph, but if a compliant investigation occurs, the traces that need to be left will still be connected through on-chain transactions and deposit/withdrawal points.

What’s a bit funny and frustrating is that, on one hand, everyone complains that the benefits of re-staking/sharing security are like stacking dolls, and then on the other hand, they hope for "privacy that can do everything with one click": wanting anonymity, easy entry and exit, and never crashing... It’s the same vibe as stacking dolls. Anyway, what I care about more now is: who am I protecting from whom’s prying eyes, and if something goes wrong, can I clearly explain the source of the funds? That’s all for now.