Lately I've been looking into on-chain privacy, and the more I look, the more I think people shouldn't have too many illusions: on-chain is basically like a public ledger, and what can be "hidden" is more about raising the cost of correlation, not making you completely anonymous. To put it simply, a more realistic expectation for ordinary users is: don't do evil, avoid gray-area activities, keep transaction paths simple and straightforward, and retain records you can explain clearly. If you're ever questioned, at least you won't feel guilty inside.

Actually, compliance isn't something that suddenly drops overnight; more often, it's about platforms, entry points, and withdrawal/deposit checkpoints becoming increasingly strict. Anyway, my current approach is: if there's a simple way to do it, don't take the long route; keep wallet purposes clear, and don't treat "privacy tools" as a talisman. By the way, it reminds me of recent on-chain game crashes—inflation kicks in, studios fold, coin prices spiral—and all the on-chain data tell the story... In the end, it's not hard to see who's selling and who's buying the dip. Learning is still necessary; don't rely on luck.