I'm now checking whether the project is actually working, rather than paying too much attention to who is loudest on Twitter. I focus more on reviewing government treasury expenditures and milestones: whether the money spent has tangible results, even if it's small features, audits, documentation, or development progress—things that can be "touched." The worst are those with beautifully written budgets, but every month they just talk about "ecosystem cooperation" and "market exposure," with milestones always pushed to next month.

Recently, memes and celebrities can make things hot just with a shout, and attention shifts faster than I scroll through short videos... Veteran players advise newcomers not to take the last step, and I think the same applies to governance: don't just look at the community's heated debates, look at how the funds in proposals are spent and how acceptance is verified. Consensus, frankly, is trust bought with money; if you can't buy it, it falls apart. Anyway, I prefer to go slower, see the spectrum more clearly before taking action.