Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently reviewing projects, I found that compared to looking at candlestick charts, I prefer flipping through their "ledger album": how the treasury money is spent, whether progress is being made step by step according to milestones. To put it simply, teams that are truly working tend to have an expenditure rhythm similar to fitness check-ins — not necessarily intense, but aligned with progress; those who immediately expand their team, do publicity first, and always have their roadmap set for "next quarter," make me feel inexplicably anxious.
AI agents, automated trading, it's the same — those who talk about narratives are just looking for excitement, while those who focus on security are the ones who really spend time: whether permissions are manageable, whether contracts can be paused, whether there are contingency plans in case of issues. Anyway, when I see "fully automatic money-making," I first tuck my hands back into my pockets.
What I don't regret is: in the past, I chased after a few beautiful milestone PPTs, and even after losing money, I learned a long lesson... Next time I encounter bizarre candlestick charts, I’ll still take screenshots, but before placing an order, I’ll first check where they actually spent the money.