Recently, I saw everyone shouting "delegate votes to professionals," and I was initially quite confused: isn't this just outsourcing governance to a few big players/institutions... Basically, the governance tokens ultimately influence retail investors' emotions and the sense of security of a few accounts. No matter how beautifully the proposal is written, who executes it, how the budget is spent, and who takes the blame if something goes wrong—these are the points that make me decide whether to "approve" or not.

When the cross-chain bridge incident happened again, I was a bit slow to react; I only went to add the link after arguing in the group all night. The collective "waiting for confirmation" consensus after the oracle error is also quite funny—people usually vote actively, but when risk appears, they suddenly believe that time can solve everything. Anyway, I now see delegated voting more as "oligarchic autopilot"—it's convenient, but I don't know who really has the steering wheel... That's all for now.