Recently, someone was complaining that the tagging system of data tools on the chain is lagging and might even be deliberately fed false information. I think that's quite normal... Address profiling, to put it simply, is just giving you a rough direction, not an ID card. An address that is "smart money" today might be a project team changing masks tomorrow, or the same person playing different roles across multiple wallets. If you follow the tags and rush in, you're likely to step on bugs.

Now I see fund flows more like using a magnifying glass to check soil moisture rather than looking at weather forecasts to decide whether to harvest: first, see where the money is coming from, whether the same addresses are moving back and forth, then look at the destination—pool, exchange, bridge—and finally use tags as a note. For small funds, don't blindly believe that "clustering = truth." The best approach is to be a bit slower, double-check more carefully, and prefer to earn less than to be misled and taken away in one go.