Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, watching AI agents interact on the blockchain, many people are excitedly saying "It will be fully automated in the future."
I, on the other hand, feel a bit nervous: I see simplicity as a trap.
Authorization, limits, contract addresses, upgrade proxies—these steps really can't be fully delegated to the model for a one-sentence decision.
If something goes wrong, who takes responsibility?
To put it plainly, an agent is most like a diligent assistant, but the "final confirmation" must be done by a human, especially when it comes to signing and changing parameters.
And then there's the impulse to let the agent find the optimal path on its own—chasing high yields and spamming tasks, which is quite similar to the inflation + studio + coin price spiral in blockchain games.
Once the incentives become distorted, it can quickly collapse.
Anyway, my current approach is: read the original text when possible, minimize authorizations when possible, let the agent handle errands, but humans must guard the gate.