Over the past two days, I’ve seen a bunch of people hard-link ETF fund flows, U.S. stock risk appetite, and crypto up-and-down moves in their interpretations, and it’s kind of exhausting to watch… Plainly, people outside can talk however they want, but on-chain, the boundary between privacy and compliance—ordinary folks shouldn’t have too rosy expectations. Using a non-real-name wallet doesn’t mean you “disappear”; on-chain traces are way too easy to connect, and if it’s really investigated, there’s always a way. On the flip side, compliance doesn’t mean every single transaction has to be watched—at most, just don’t touch those obviously “washing-around” kinds of routes. I even followed someone before who kept pushing “absolute anonymity,” but the more I looked, the more uneasy I felt, so I unfollowed… For now, I’ll keep a lower profile: separate addresses, don’t grant random permissions, and decide after I wake up whether I want to get into any of it—just like this for now.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin