Just saw a transaction on-chain that looked like a “coincidence transfer”: A sends B a tiny amount, and B immediately breaks it into several parts and sends them out—at first glance, it looks like a code. Later, I manually traced it into paths to take a closer look (actually, it’s just clicking through each hop wallet…), and found it was most likely: an initial test transfer → entering aggregation/routing → then landing in a few new addresses to carry out tasks.

Put plainly, it’s not mysticism—it’s a little script trick to save gas. Now that these new L1/L2s are issuing incentives, people rush in. And it’s not unreasonable that veteran users complain about “dig—transfer—sell”; the on-chain traces are written quite plainly.

Anyway, I stick to the same approach: write the budget on paper—if the charts look good, save them; if they don’t, just treat it as passing by.