Honestly, the term "modular blockchain" sounds very "architectural and impressive," but for end users, the real changes are mostly not about slogans like "more decentralization," but rather: just clicking a confirmation same as before, with more stable transaction fees and wait times, and less hassle when migrating between chains. You don't need to understand which layer is responsible for execution or data; in the end, it feels like upgrading a server.



However, I’m also not sure if it can completely solve the old problem of "getting stuck and paying high fees during peak times." Anyway, it seems to be splitting different tasks, making scalability more of an engineering problem rather than something driven by emotional tug-of-war.

Recently, the testnet incentives and points system have become popular again, and everyone is guessing whether the mainnet will issue tokens... I personally prefer following the process: automate what can be automated, quantify what can be quantified, and don’t turn yourself into a manual laborer just for uncertain airdrops.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin