I've been lurking in the group for a long time, but I can't help but say this: in the secondary market, cutting royalties over and over again, the most awkward part is that the creators' expectations are directly shattered. To put it simply, you ask people to create content/art, but the more lively the transactions become later, the less they actually get. Who would genuinely want to update long-term? But I also understand that traders find the costs too high, especially with cross-chain transfers, bridge fees, and slippage already being tough enough. Adding an extra layer of royalties really hurts...

Recently, discussions about stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and screenshots claiming "de-pegging" keep circulating in the group. When everyone's emotions tighten, they become even less willing to pay any "invisible fees." Anyway, now I always ask clearly about projects: whether royalties are mandatory or voluntary, how the money is actually split, and most importantly, whether it can be transparent. Don’t let it end up with everyone insulting each other, creators running away, and liquidity being drained. That’s all for now.