Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
In the past, hearing the word "modularization" made me quite excited, feeling like it was going to revolutionize again.
Now, after calming down and thinking about it, there are actually only two things for ordinary people: one is that transaction fees and confirmation experiences might become smoother, and the second is that there are more chains and bridges...
To put it simply, the risk surface is also expanding.
Before, I would just "go with whichever chain is hot," but now I’ve gotten used to asking first: Do I want to cross assets?
If I cross and come back, who do I rely on?
Where can responsibility be traced if something goes wrong?
Recently, the AI Agent and automated trading narratives have been quite noisy, everyone talks about "automatic interaction," but I care more about who they hand the private keys/authorizations to, which bridge or route the scripts connect to.
Modularization breaks down the building blocks, which might improve the experience, but it also makes it harder to find the fault.
Anyway, I’d rather go slower than risk handing myself over to a bunch of invisible components just for convenience.