Lately, the more I play on the chain, the more I realize that you shouldn't have too many illusions about privacy. To put it simply, a wallet address isn't an ID card, but it's close enough. If someone really starts to target you, linking on-chain activity with exchange deposits and withdrawals, many so-called "anonymous" claims will only be psychological comfort. My current expectation is: use normally without overcomplicating things, don't treat privacy as a get-out-of-jail-free card, and if you cross the line of compliance, you've crossed it.



These days, when the staking/sharing security setup gets criticized as a "copycat," I can understand. The returns look attractive when stacked, but the longer the path, the more exposure there is: multi-signature, bridges, contracts, permissions... any misstep along the way is enough to cause trouble. Anyway, I treat auxiliary activities as cost-based; keep addresses separate, limit the amounts, don't get carried away with positions—just stick to this for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin