Lately, I've been browsing DAO voting proposals, and the more I look at them, the more they seem like collages: on the surface, it's "parameter optimization/upgrades," but behind the scenes, it's really about redistributing who can receive incentives and who has the say. Frankly, many proposals aren't about whether they're "good or bad," but about "who's more convenient, who’s more stable." You see, the income for miners/validators, MEV, and fair ordering are also being criticized by retail investors, but it's actually the same logic: change the rules, and the cake shifts position.

Right now, I think there's no need to rush to pick a side in voting; first, figure out two things: where the incentives come from, and who ultimately makes the decision (whether it's a few big players or a bunch of delegated proxies). To put it simply: don't just look at slogans, follow the money and see where power is concentrating. Positions will also become more cautious, and only after the dust settles will I add more color.