Lately, I keep seeing the words "modularization," and people think that once this thing is implemented, regular users will immediately have a great experience, transaction fees will always be low, and wallets can be done with just a couple of taps. In reality, most of the time you're still jumping back and forth between signing, waiting for confirmations, and confusing cross-chain prompts—it's just that the backend has separated "accounting" and "record-keeping," like changing the stage scenery, and the audience may not notice right away.

For someone like me who focuses on NFT finance and art cash flow, the real change might be that the same series and the same yield logic can more easily run on different execution layers, and liquidity becomes more "modular." But the more you assemble, the more fragmented the risks become—bridges, ordering, data availability—any failure in these areas can make your stomach churn.

Recently, some mainstream chains have undergone upgrades/maintenance, and everyone is guessing whether projects will migrate… I’m actually more concerned about whether users will need to re-authorize after migration, and whether the royalties and revenue sharing of old contracts will be disrupted. The more rigid the structure, the softer the story, but the real gold in the wallet is still pretty solid, so better to be cautious.