Recently looking at LST and re-staking, the more I analyze, the more it seems like splitting "returns" into several channels: one is the inflation/fees from basic staking, and the rest are actually "rent" paid by new projects to attract security + emotional premiums. To put it simply, money doesn't grow out of thin air; someone is paying for it, or it's an early withdrawal of future expectations. The risks are similar: de-pegging, contract/operation issues, re-staking stacking leading to a surge in correlation. It looks quite stable normally, but when a run occurs, everything shakes together. Modularization and the development of the DA layer are now hot topics among developers, while users are often confused. I, on the other hand, am more cautious... Instead of talking about fate, let's talk about probability: high returns correspond to a wider tail, and whether you can withstand it is what really matters.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin