Recently, I've seen everyone talk about AI Agents automatically doing on-chain arbitrage and rebalancing, but honestly, I don't dare to fully entrust it. Checking balances, pulling on-chain data, price comparisons—these are indeed fast, but when it comes to "that one signature," it still needs human oversight: Is the authorization limit too high? Is the contract newly deployed? Are there strange pools in the routing? Should I withdraw if gas suddenly spikes? Is the cross-chain bridge queueing again? And in extreme market conditions, the Agent might mechanically execute strategies, ending up turning your "hedging" into a "simultaneous blowup." My approach is: only let it give suggestions and small test orders, with layered permissions, treat hot wallets as consumables, and manually confirm key positions.



As for the modular/DA layer narrative, developers get more and more excited talking about it, while users are often confused—that's normal. After all, the most painful thing when things go wrong is still that authorization in the wallet.

That's all for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin