Actually, everyone understands that the idea of staking/sharing security sounds very appealing: a single asset repeatedly "standing guard," with compounded returns. But lately, the more I look at it, the more I feel that stacking returns can easily lead to stacking illusions—risk isn't linear addition. It could be that the same signature/same key/same set of contract permissions are reused in multiple places, and when something goes wrong, everything shakes together.

I helped a friend set up once; it was just "multiple sources of income," but the wallet's authorizations were a mess, and the nonce was stuck on a failed cancellation transaction. Everything was queued afterward... Basically, security sharing also means sharing the trouble.

And recently, those large on-chain transfers or hot and cold wallets of exchanges being interpreted as "smart money" whenever they move, just leaves me speechless: many times, it's just internal rebalancing, fee topping, or signature swapping. Don’t treat others’ operation sequences as signals. Anyway, I now prefer to earn a little less rather than rushing to clarify authorizations, signature domains, and nonce queues first.