Recently, I've seen a bunch of "re-staking + shared security" talk as if stacking Buffs, with returns layered on top of each other, looking quite appealing. But I always feel like the illusion is stacking up too... To put it plainly, risks don't disappear just because you change the name; they're just packaged more smoothly.

Right now, I really follow the accounting method of Shell: the extra gains are first calculated to include fees, unbinding periods, and the possibility of being cut, otherwise it's like trading long-term sleep for short-term excitement, which isn't worth it.
By the way, the NFT royalty debate is quite lively, with creators saying they want income, and the market saying it needs liquidity. It sounds funny and frustrating: everyone wants "both," but in the end, no one really secures either. Anyway, I'll slow down first and not let the returns hypnotize my mind.