Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Just saw Billy Marcus rant about X’s algorithm issues—this guy co-founded Dogecoin and is now very dissatisfied with X’s recommendation mechanism. His core point is actually quite simple: the percentage algorithm of a social platform should be very direct; the content from the people you follow should be prioritized for you, and your content should mainly be promoted to your followers.
Musk himself has also admitted there are problems with the algorithm and has been tweaking it. But the question is: how optimized is X’s percentage algorithm at this point? In these past few months, how many times has it been changed? It feels like there’s a new change every few weeks. The crypto community has a lot of objections to this—especially after X restricted InfoFi app permissions last month, when Kaito’s token price crashed directly, sparking a wave of discussion.
Interestingly, X is also rolling out new features, such as smart tags and Starterpacks, to help users discover content more effectively. But can that solve the core problem with the percentage algorithm? It still feels like it comes down to how the data performs later. What do you think—does X’s algorithm logic really have a problem?