Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, there has been controversy in the secondary market over cutting and cutting NFT royalties. To put it simply, everyone just wants to "trade better," but for creators, it becomes "what the hell do I live on." I can understand both sides: trading needs liquidity, creation needs predictable cash flow, but when platforms change rules, the first to get hurt is actually trust.
These days, the "yield stacking" of pledge and shared security has also been criticized as being like nested dolls. I also get a bit of a déjà vu feeling: when rules and incentives are layered on top of each other, it looks lively in the short term, but in the long run, it can easily turn into an account nobody can clearly explain.
What I fear most is not slowness but chaos—being slow at least still allows for clear calculations; chaos only leaves decisions to emotion. Anyway, what I care more about now is whether protocols/markets can clearly specify "who gets what, when," and if they can't, no matter how attractive the narrative, I’ll hold off first.