Recently, there has been controversy in the secondary market over cutting and cutting NFT royalties. To put it simply, everyone just wants to "trade better," but for creators, it becomes "what the hell do I live on." I can understand both sides: trading needs liquidity, creation needs predictable cash flow, but when platforms change rules, the first to get hurt is actually trust.



These days, the "yield stacking" of pledge and shared security has also been criticized as being like nested dolls. I also get a bit of a déjà vu feeling: when rules and incentives are layered on top of each other, it looks lively in the short term, but in the long run, it can easily turn into an account nobody can clearly explain.

What I fear most is not slowness but chaos—being slow at least still allows for clear calculations; chaos only leaves decisions to emotion. Anyway, what I care more about now is whether protocols/markets can clearly specify "who gets what, when," and if they can't, no matter how attractive the narrative, I’ll hold off first.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin