On the subway, I saw a bunch of "AI Agents helping you automate on-chain operations," sounds pretty appealing, but I now believe: the only thing that can be automated is the hands, the safety net is still the brain... For example, with authorization/limits, no matter how smart the Agent is, it could still set you an "infinite" limit, and if you don’t look at it, don’t blame your wallet for crying. And with cross-chain, signatures, contract addresses—one mistake isn’t a "rollback," it’s a direct disappearance. Recently, on-chain data tools and tagging systems have also been criticized for lagging or misleading, and I resonate with that: Agents rely heavily on the "perception" fed to them, if the tags are off, they follow suit. Honestly, machines are good for repetitive tasks, but humans are responsible for the "final confirmation" and "when to stop." Pink doesn’t equal a bubble, but bubbles are often very pink; seeing overly smooth automation makes me press confirm a couple more times.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin